Florida Memory is administered by the Florida Department of State, Division of Library and Information Services, Bureau of Archives and Records Management. The digitized records on Florida Memory come from the collections of the State Archives of Florida and the special collections of the State Library of Florida.
State Archives of Florida
- ArchivesFlorida.com
- State Archives Online Catalog
- ArchivesFlorida.com
- ArchivesFlorida.com
State Library of Florida
Related Sites
Description of previous item
Description of next item
Lower Court
Date
Box
Folder
Transcript
United States of America
District of West Florida
To Elijah Robbins and William Evans, Esqrs Greeting
Having special trust and confidence in your skill and fidelity you or any two of you are hereby authorized and empowered to take in the form of Law, the testimony of Robert C. Adams, Warham Cromwell, & William M. Loften, to be read in evidence in the trial of a libel against the Schooner Emperor, and against Charles G. Cox Master, before the Judge of our Superior Court of Law at Pensacola; and the same having taken, to be sealed up by you and directed to the said Supreme Court with the Commission.
Witness the Honorable John A Cameron Judge of our said court at Pensacola this twenty fifth day of June in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred & thirty seven and of the Independence of the United States the 61st year
Wm. W. Kelly Clk
United States
vs.
Charles G. Cox
Information
and
United States
vs.
Schooner Emperor
Libel
By virtue of a precept directed to us as commissioners from the Office of the Clerk of the Subpoena Court for the County of Escambia in the District of West-Florida, to take depositions in said causes, Robert C. Adams, William M. Loften, & Warham Cromwell, Appeared before us on the 21st day of August 1837 and being duly sworn and cautioned, Robert C. Adams answers to the 1st I do not know the Schooner or Cox --
Title
Subject
Description
One consequence of Florida's coastal geography and proximity to the Caribbean was that the territory served as a frequent terminus for the illicit slave trade. Although the slave trade was formally abolished in 1808, slave catchers continued to kidnap African people and transport them across the Atlantic Ocean to the Americas. Such illegal trafficking in human cargo provoked the case United States v. Schooner Emperor.
In early 1837, the schooner Emperor left Cuba for the United States. Its destination was the port of St. Joseph along Florida's northern Gulf coast. Charles G. Cox, captain of the Emperor, intended to discreetly unload his illegal cargo and reap a handsome profit. According to a Florida law passed in 1822, the fine for smuggling slaves into Florida was $300 per individual. Men like Cox considered this fine worth the risk.
Harbor officials apparently made no effort to thoroughly inspect the Emperor upon its arrival in St. Joseph Bay. Local citizens alerted the authorities, however, when they perceived blacks moving about on the deck of the ship. At some point the kidnapped Africans were brought ashore, marched overland, and then ferried across St. Andrew's Bay (near modern-day Panama City). Their final destination was a life of servitude on a plantation in Washington County.
United States Marshall Samuel Duval followed the rumors and recovered the smuggled Africans. Under the law of 1822, these people should have received their freedom, but their fate is unclear from the documents remaining in the case file. Perhaps they were returned to Africa? Documents from the case suggest that the group indeed came directly from Africa, as opposed to having been kidnapped from elsewhere in the Caribbean.
Attention now turned to the fate of the Emperor. Upon depositing its cargo at St. Joseph Bay, the ship traveled to Pensacola, Mobile, and then planned to return to Havana. Cox apparently determined to take a detour and landed again at Pensacola. Authorities seized the ship when it docked at Pensacola and took Cox into custody. Cox quickly posted bail and thereafter disappears from the remainder of records related to the case.
The Circuit Court of West Florida in Pensacola debated what would become of the ship. The evidence implicating the vessel in the illegal slave trade proved scant. No one came forward to testify on behalf of the territory of Florida, so the court determined to return the vessel to its owners. Apparently, too many people still benefited from the illegal slave trade. No one who originally alerted authorities to the illegal cargo came forward and no one pressured the original whistleblowers into testifying.
Lawyers challenged the decision to return the Emperor to its owners and the case went to the Territorial Court of Appeals. The high court determined to put the Emperor up for public auction, with the proceeds reverting to the territory. Marshall Duval collected the funds, but refused to deposit them into the territory's coffers. Eventually, Duval conceded, but, because of a lack of evidence, the funds ultimately returned to the claimants of the Emperor.
This case is an important example of the illegal slave trade activity that took place in Florida's waters before the Civil War. It also demonstrates the difficulty in bringing to justice those that continued to kidnap African people and import them illegally into the United States.
To learn more about this case, see Dorothy Dodd, "The Schooner Emperor: An Incident of the Illegal Slave Trade in Florida," The Florida Historical Quarterly 13:3 (January 1935): 117-128.
Creator
Source
Date
Format
Language
Type
Identifier
Folder
Box
Lower Court
Total Images
Image Path
Image Path - Large
Transcript Path
Thumbnail
Chicago Manual of Style
Florida Supreme Court. United States v. Schooner Emperor. 1839. State Archives of Florida, Florida Memory. <https://www.floridamemory.com/items/show/260668>, accessed 25 December 2024.
MLA
Florida Supreme Court. United States v. Schooner Emperor. 1839. State Archives of Florida, Florida Memory. Accessed 25 Dec. 2024.<https://www.floridamemory.com/items/show/260668>
AP Style Photo Citation
(State Archives of Florida/Florida Supreme Court)